Namespaces: do namespaces need to be divided up in groups?
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
We made a namespace per type of data.
Many other namespaces could follow: OIMs, federation facades, etc.
A namespace URI is related to an endpoint address. The endpoints are divided up per owner.
If we look at ownership, there could be less namespaces. E.g. just one for the RDL + base/core templates + metadata + OIMs (specialized templates).
If we look at type of data, and potentially different owners for any kind of reason, there should be many more namespaces.
Do we want to condense the number of namespaces to known ownership, or do we want to divide data up in as many namespaces as possible, so per data group?
Code: Select all
xmlns:p7tm="http://standards.iso.org/iso/ts/15926/-8/ed-1/tech/reference-data/template-model#"
xmlns:p7tpl="http://standards.iso.org/iso/ts/15926/-8/ed-1/tech/reference-data/templates#"
xmlns:dm="http://standards.iso.org/iso/ts/15926/-8/ed-1/tech/reference-data/data-model#"
xmlns:meta="http://standards.iso.org/iso/ts/15926/-8/ed-1/tech/reference-data/metadata#"
A namespace URI is related to an endpoint address. The endpoints are divided up per owner.
If we look at ownership, there could be less namespaces. E.g. just one for the RDL + base/core templates + metadata + OIMs (specialized templates).
If we look at type of data, and potentially different owners for any kind of reason, there should be many more namespaces.
Do we want to condense the number of namespaces to known ownership, or do we want to divide data up in as many namespaces as possible, so per data group?